Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VDSmanager
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Der Wohltempierte Fuchs (talk) 00:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- VDSmanager (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No indication of notability. May be spam? Peni (talk) 22:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 00:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. [1] and [2] (both google translations of original Russian-language articles) appear to be reliable sources with a reasonable amount of coverage of this product. JulesH (talk) 14:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Both articles actually say only that there is such software and some providers use it. I couldn't find any articles dedicated solely to this software which may be an indication for absense of public interest. --Peni (talk) 14:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not notable. No substantial coverage in reliable sources provided or found. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:59, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the two articles found by JulesH are not about the product specifically, and is mentioned as part of the article. I am unable to find any other sources about the product. I've also checked Computerworld, NetworkWorld, and InfromationWeek without coming up with any articles. -- Whpq (talk) 15:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete looked; nuffing Chzz ► 16:41, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-consumer software with no showing of importance. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 18:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete spam. WikiScrubber (talk) 14:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.